Threats and the Need to Revisit Service Charge in Nigerian Estates




Across the world, close residential places evolved for the people who prefer a unique and quality environment. The distinctiveness and better environment are connected with the specific rules and conditions which every occupant must follow. Like what is operating in countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, among others, occupants in Nigerian Estates are expected to pay service charge monthly or yearly.
Infoprations’ check reveals that service charge, as a mandatory payment in most Estates, covers the cost of maintenance and repairs of shared facilities such as driveway, reception areas, corridors, lifts, grass cutting/gardening, Close Circuit Television (CCTV) equipment among others. The collection of service charge enables owners of Estates to recover the costs of operating a property from the occupiers as well as any other persons who benefit from and use the shared services or facilities provided, according to the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
However, the recent activities show that this payment in most Estates located in Lagos, Abuja and Port-Harcourt is being threatened by certain forces.  Since 2012, stakeholders at the heart of service charge determination and payment have been in conflict over the increase in the fee and the failure of some residents to fulfill their payment conditions. From the homeowners to the property and facility managers, the fee needs to be revisited in the face of current economic challenges and ineffective procurement and management processes.
Available information indicates that the average service charge pay by the residents of Banana Island Estate is N8, 375,000 yearly. Those occupying units at 1004 Estate paid N658, 000 in 2015. In the current year, information reveals service charge payment for the residents of Osborne Foreshore Estate starts from N500, 000 and above. In the last three years, the defaulters have been punished. For instance, in 2015, a Church premise was reportedly shutdown by a property manager when the occupant failed to pay the required service charge.
Having seen the extent to which property and facility managers are disconnecting defaulters from the shared services or facilities, occupiers are now forming associations (a condition not known in most Estates before). Infoprations found that collaboration among homeowners is on the rise. In Estates located in Lagos, collective efforts are being made to protect some defaulters by reconnecting the disconnected shared facilities.
Infoprations sees this as a significant threat to the service charge platform. These insights have shown that the payment platform and factors for its determinant need to be revisited. The fundamental principle which says managers of property and users should set a service charge together need to be embraced.
In the last three years, the occupiers’ views has been that the procurement and management of the shared services processes are faulty, calling for efficiency in procurement and transparency towards significant cost reduction which will ensure payment of low service charge.

Comments