Mapping and Mitigating Procurement Fraud Risk in Nigerian Facility Management Industry

Credit: Infoprations Analysis, 2018

Fraud and money laundering have been part of the factors that earn Nigeria one of the most corrupt countries in the world over the years. It is obvious that private and public sectors are not immune from fraud and corruption especially in the procurement cycles. Consequences are often devastating on organisations’ finances and reputation.
Within the procurement process, illicit rebates, kickbacks and dubious vendor relationships are the most common fraud activities. In this regard, facility management companies could not be exonerated because most solutions are executed by purchasing appropriate materials or goods from manufacturers and suppliers.
Infoprations’ experiences have shown that companies in the FM industry need to be proactive in detecting and mitigating procurement fraud risk before 2019. In addition to the impacts of the quality and financial risks identified previously, companies in the industry are most likely to lose a significant amount of money to the risk and a developing bad corporate image that would be difficult to disentangle in the next few years.   
Experience has shown that procurement department is more vulnerable to fraud than any other department in the FM companies. Employees within procurement, operations and administration units in most cases lack service mentality; they are more interested in serving themselves than serving their companies. Thus, a high percentage of fraud occurs in these units.
Experience has equally suggested that fraud begins from the point of getting the Purchase Order (when clients are requesting for the Supply Solution) to the delivery of goods. Procurement and Administration officers are either inflating the price or collude with the supplier/vendor to get their own share, experience suggests.

Factors Increasing the illicit Act

Actors would succeed because of the cartels and cabals assistance model adoption. Staffs in the three units are more likely to work together and won’t disclose the wrongdoings within their folks. Infoprations believes that there are measures companies can take on the micro, the meso and the macro levels to avert consequences on cost saving and value addition narratives being promoted to the FM solutions users. The measures could include strong organisational values or ethics teaching and adherence, and disciplinary actions or policies.

Mapping the Actors

From the insights, it is essential that companies employ Strategic Fraud Map for the detection of the main and minor actors. Activities of the procurement officer, administration officer, drivers, technicians and head of the procurement department would be more understood through the map. While drawing the map, the existence of cyclic and smooth relationships among participants must be revealed. Cyclic relationship would occur when one or two participants are not comfortable with the activities within the fraud process or being sidelined in the whole game. On the other hand, smooth relationship will exist when participants are deriving mutual benefits. These participants need to be separated or retrenched from the department.

Comments