How Facebook Users Could Be Biggest Risk to New Governors’ Reputation



The Nigerian political environment is highly demanding for politicians and elected officials; being a developing economy, elected officials face almost the same teething problems on water, electricity, road, hospital, education, unemployment, high state debt, low level of revenue from the national coffers, dwindling internally generated revenue and general chaos associated with politicking.
Political officeholders are rated by the public based on their performances on the afore-listed and other areas of the economy, especially their ability to beat expectations and the records of their predecessors in office. Coupled with this is the constant, dangerous and destructive onslaught of political rivals and supposed ‘enemies’ who invent strategies to downplay the performance or achievements of a political office-holder, create problems and strive to ensure that such a political office-holder does not succeed. Therefore, as a politician is struggling to meet and surpass his or her electioneering promises, he or she battles the headaches created by his or her enemies. Note that violence of all types, kidnapping, hooliganism, blackmail, defamation, assassination, and spiritual attacks are some of the stocks in the arsenal of political detractors capable of destroying the reputation of any political office-holder.
Most importantly is the online reputation of politicians which can be damaged and totally destroyed within some minutes. As at March, 2019, 55.5% of Nigerians connect online and can easily share contents within and without; the situation is made worse because of the inability to easily track these detractors and those who have read or seen what they posted, and correct the misgiving imputed.
StatCounter, Infoprations Analysis, 2019
This development has implications for the newly elected governors and their future aspiration in the corridors of power. The consequences would be severe on the governors who had issues during primary elections. Our data suggest that the aggrieved members of their parties are likely to sponsor Facebook users or recruit detractors to set them (elected governors) up using fear, anger and sadness. These emotions would be used mostly when they are expressing their views on employment generation, infrastructure and poverty reduction.
The elected governors should also expect attacks tailored towards their personalities rather than the parties. The reason is that politician-induced Facebook users will shift their distraction and reputation attack activities towards individuals not the parties because the campaign has ended and there is a need for whoever dreams to contest in 2023 to start the mobilization in 2019.
In our experience, we have also understood that the sponsor Facebook users or detractors’ views would not reflect three narrative tactics –presentation of the governors’ ideas, experiences and understanding of the current socio-economic status of the state and possessing concrete plan towards its development as expected. Therefore, reputation management, especially on offline and online media, is a key ingredient of a successful political experience.

Comments